P35超频时代，微星导航-P35白金版

Ivanqu

这里很多的网友测试都很精彩，让我感觉都是超频大师，哈哈，小弟不才超频写文都奇烂，那就总结下，看看MSI P35主板在我这里的得分！
续Intel 上代芯片组以后，各个厂商都推出了新一代基于P35 架构的新主板，MSI 为全球三大板卡厂商之一，这次第一个发布P35产品的厂商。MSI P35产品线非常充实，各种价位都很适合大众用户选择，这次大张旗鼓，首打的产品为 MSI P35 Platiunm主板，在MSI产品定位上，Platiunm 是MSI 的高端产品，价格和性能也是超高的，为了能让更多的用户能够享受到产品，感谢MSI给我们这个活动去参加，我们先看看主板


全固态电容，让主机板的寿命和稳定型得到增强

MSI在超频领域也不断小试牛刀，在这款MSI P35 Platiunm 主板上，还是设计保守，使用4个R25全封闭电感，12个MOSFET，组成了4相12回路的供电。



在ASUS 和GIGABYTE等厂商，所有测试中发现，MSI的主板温度是最低的，这是因为这次在散热上MSI花下了最大的功夫，使用全铜热管的散热器"Circu-Pipe",，我们习惯性的称之为“过山车”。成为一句经典的词语。这是MSI产品最大的改变，随后可以看到MSI产品也为玩家有独特的设计



这是失传已久的硬跳线，只要我们使用，C2D或者QX系列的CPU，我们能更好用跳线直接超频，从200FSB 设置到266FSB,最后可以设置到333FSB,确实方便了玩家超频，也让早期使用E6300 E6600的用户直接免费升级，到333FSB，hoho不要以为这只是提高了一下外频，最重要的是MSI直接解决了 FSB Starp 问题，注意从400MHZ 开始到450MHZ 性能会直接下降，唯有通过MSI设计神奇跳线，很方便的解决了！
这里转下BT的Strap 的文，主要针对266FSB CPU的，如果使用别的主机板的用户，也可以用铜丝去解决FSB Strap
FSB Strap

Look, the change of the FSB frequency through hardware has no effect on the performance – both lines coincide ideally. However, between 440 and 450MHz FSB the system performance crashes down if the FSB jumper is set at 266MHz, although in case of 333MHz FSB jumper setting, the system performance keeps growing stably. More thorough investigation revealed that the breaking point is the transition from 447MHz to 448MHz. Read speed equals 8538MB/s at 447MHz, but drops to 5594MB/s at 448MHz.
Keeping in mind that hardware FSB switching only increases or reduces the starting frequency with 67MHz increment, we assumed that the maximum frequency when the performance of the memory subsystem drops down dramatically, may also be shifted with the same increment. In other words, it is possible that when you overclock CPUs with the nominal 200MHz FSB speed, the performance will also drop so dramatically at around 381MHz frequency (448-67=381). We confirmed our supposition during the tests with Intel Core 2 Duo E4300 processor. The read speed reached 7091MB/s at 381MHz FSB, but dropped down to 4732MB/s at 382MHz.
Actually, there is nothing catastrophic about the above described cases. For CPUs with 200MHz bus that can overclock to 382MHz FSB and higher, you just need to set the FSB frequency jumper to 266MHz in order to push the dangerous limit a little farther. The same is true for CPUs with the nominal frequency of 266MHz: you have to set the jumper to 333MHz FSB and you can stop worrying about overclocking beyond 447MHz frequency.
However, there is another danger that awaits us here. Our experiments proved that by changing FSB setting from 266 to 200MHz we lower the threshold from 448MHz to 382MHz. Therefore, by changing the FSB setting from 266 to 333MHz we can obviously expect this notorious threshold not to vanish anywhere but to get shifted to 515MHz (448+67=515). Unfortunately, at this time we don’t have a CPU at our disposal that could overclock to 515MHz and up, so we cannot confirm this supposition experimentally. However, the probability of such outcome is pretty high.
非常有意思，这里揭示了333跳线的真正好处：
500外频内没有FSB Strap
实战，实战
Performance during Overclocking
Numerous performance comparisons in our previous reviews showed that the performance of Intel P35 Express based mainboards is not very much different from that of the Intel P965 Express based ones in nominal work modes. The detailed performance analysis of the

Asus P5K Deluxe

mainboard in our recent review showed that this is true up until we overclock FSB to 400MHz. Of course, the performance would be about the same only if you compare Asus mainboards. Mainboards from other manufacturers may shift the balance in any direction.
However, we know that the performance of Asus mainboards on Intel P965 Express drops down dramatically starting with 401MHz. How will the situation change if we compare the systems overclocked to 490MHz FSB. Besides, it would be also interesting to find out how the drop in the memory subsystem performance affects the overall system speed when we get beyond the notorious 448MHz threshold on MSI P35 Platinum mainboard.
For our experiments we assembled a few test platforms using the following hardware components:
Mainboards:
MSI P35 Platinum (Intel P35 Express), MS-7345 v 1.1, BIOS 1.1;
Asus Commando (Intel P965 Express), rev 1.00G, BIOS 1001;
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 CPU (1.86GHz, FSB 266MHz, Conroe-2M, rev. B2);
2x1024MB Corsair Dominator TWIN2X2048-9136C5D;
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB graphics card;
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 HDD, ST3320620AS, 7200rpm, 16MB, SATA 320GB;
Zalman CNPS9700 LED CPU cooler;
OCZ GameXStream GXS700 PSU (700W).
The tests were performed in Windows
vista
OS. We overclocked the CPU to 490MHz FSB in two ways on MSI P35 Platinum mainboard: by setting the FSB frequency jumper to 266MHz and to 333MHz.

The memory was working in synchronous mode with the 1:1 divider. Since it is hard to adjust the memory timings on MSI P35 Platinum in a desired way, all of them were left at defaults. After that we set the memory timings on Asus Commando board to the same values.



MemSet utility doesn’t read the correct memory frequency on Asus Commando: it actually equals the same 490(980)MHz, as on MSI P35 Platinum.
The performance of a system with Asus Commando mainboard and Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 processor overclocked to 490MHz bus is marked as “Intel P965”. Even Asus mainboard on Intel P965 Express suffers a noticeable performance drop in this case. We tested MSI P35 Platinum with the CPU overclocked to the same 490MHz bus in two modes: with the jumper set to 266MHz and 333MHz marked as “P35 FSB 266” and “P35 FSB 333” respectively. In the first case performance dropped at 447MHz, while in the second case performance didn’t get any lower.

这就是差别


没有FSB STRAP的性能差别比较大的






Other benchmark results do not need any commentary on my part, because they fall in one of the three above described situations:
MSI P35 Platinum is the slowest when the performance drops beyond 448MHz;
Asus Commando is the slowest when the performance drops beyond 401MHz;
There is barely any performance difference at all.








As you see, the performance drop depends a lot on the application type. It may be significant if the system performance depends on the memory speed, or hardly noticeable if the results are determined by the graphics card type of CPU frequency.

这个测试有机会翻译给大家，FSB Strap后面种，我是直接改的，我比较暴力，直接上焊锡的....大家可以用银漆，修正液+铅笔解决.



细部



怎么没有金色的焊锡...



这个为CCMOS健，不需要用跳线短接，只要按下就行，绝对贴心设计，希望以后能加上POW RET 2个键这个更方便了。
放点自己测试时候的图



U120 E 上去正好,蛮威的,配上GSKILL
内存
真好看,就是天生一对啊!!



加了个vantec fans ,美啊......



接下来测试
测试分了几个步骤
干冰测试



昨天测试干冰来实验主机板，一个通宵，把我累的生病了，现在放放成果吧！
空冷激超543FSB MSI P35主板外频继续震荡上扬！！


http://blog.zol.com.cn/470/article_469243.html
用FSB来证明主机板多好



上了干冰，有苦说不出啊
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=229316
测试也使用了干冰极限测试。可是没有windows 的setfsb.clockgen工具，可惜了我这个622*7的CPU，这个测试彻底让我知道MSI的 core center软件太保守了，FSB，调整只到3**多，遗憾，本来就是想破记录的，只有等新的CLOCKGEN或者setfsb了...



检验测试了FSB,我们来测试下4核心的干冰测试会是怎么样
QX6700 小走干冰....
http://blog.zol.com.cn/470/article_469244.html



电压加到1.6v左右了，看到都是-36 度了，看来4相供电真的不行啊，Q系列上这个板子4G真的很吃力啊
来个验证连接
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=229315
这个是4.15G 走的，走四核心超频，优点累...这是第二个上干冰的CPU，里面的丙酮我都没换，看看按这温度比之前的要高很多了....
第三个CPU，为E6600 主频也达到了4.32G
昨天连续3个U上DI ，这个是E6600
http://blog.zol.com.cn/470/article_469997.html



干冰才这点我要哭了，俗话说心急吃不了热豆腐，连续3次DI 导致炮里都是水，又没去处理，就这样了
连续走干冰，炮里面都是水，和冰水冷一样
认证
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=229628
昨天的3个CPU 在MSI 主板的干冰测试，一个晚上做2个干冰测试已经很吃力了，3个，这次把我弄发高烧了，还请了一天的病假，哎，谁叫MSI板子好呢！
不得不提在这款主板上超频内存是非常强劲的，小弟2：3分频2V 电压1200MHZ 走5 5 4 9 轻松而过
内存调节上也比965主板好超很多很多!
附上内存测试
内存测试：
　　MSI P35 Platinum  在cpuz1.4下,我们发现这对内存的的生产日期为2007年第9周.预设Spd 有DDR2 800 和DDR2 1000 2个Spd 信息. Super Talent在外包装上预设比较保守设定为DDR2 1000 5-5-5-15.所以在接下来的测试中我们会做3组内存频率不同的对比,很直观的看到各个频率下参数效能的区别.
使用everesthome,我们看到在预设的SPD中各项对应的电压


DDR2 800 5-5-4-12 对应在2.2v  DDR2 1000 4-5-4-15 对应在2.3v
内存厂商选用DDR2 1000 5-5-5-15 1.8V
DDR2 1000 CL4有了很好的提升范围.接下来我们看看性能对比测试
DDR2 800 4-5-4-12
DDR2 1000 5-5-5-15
DDR2 1000 4-5-4-15

super pi 分数越低越好

Sisoft Sandra Memory Bandwidth 分数越高越好

Memory Test 分数越高越好

内存潜伏分数越低越好
　　在预设SPD中我们发现性能差异很大，所以建议使用内存走到CL4 厂商最优化时序。
在测试稳定参数对比后我们又测试了超频后的成绩，看看效能到底提高多少！
　　直接DDR2-1200 启动，CPU 超频至400FSB 即6300 主频为2.8G (400*7)
　　内存走为DDR2-1200 2:3 最严格的分频，测试如下

DDR2-1200 CL5-5-5-15

DDR2-1200 CL4-4-4-9

super pi 分数越低越好

Sisoft Sandra Memory Bandwidth 分数越高越好

Memory Test 分数越高越好

内存潜伏分数越低越好
内存测试還算不错，达到DDR2-1200的低延时，那个时候电压都是3v的...
此内存颗粒为D9GKX，上1200已经很不容易了
这是最早用P01bios 测试，那个时候的效能还不够好。不过也能到那么高

测试有喜有悲，关注我的BLOG，还有很多P35白金版的测试，那个比较全面的测试QX6700 的效能，E6300 Q6600针对P35白金版本的测试，大家都去看看吧
给MSI提出几个建议

1.希望bios 内存参数有更多更细致的参数
2.南桥散热器过高，有些
显卡
插上优点小问题
3.希望能加入类似ez 接口的，PWR RET2个键
4.希望在CORE CENTER 里面选择FSB 能够到700左右
总结，MSI P35 系列很很容易让普通玩家上手的主板，不仅保证了优异的做工和稳定型，还能享受到
创新
的设计和超频的乐趣，也希望能有更好的产品给大家！

moop

不错正在用 呵呵